Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
data:verb_categorization [2008/01/20 15:40]
alexlenci
— (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Task 1.c - Verb Categorization ====== 
- 
-==== Introduction ==== 
- 
-The goal of the sub-task is to group verbs into semantic categories. 
- 
-The {{verb.categorization.dataset.tar.gz |data set}} consists of 45 verbs, belonging to 9 semantic classes. The classification scheme is inspired to the one described in P. Vinson & G. Vigliocco (2007), “Semantic Feature Production Norms for a Large Set of Objects and Events”, //Behavior Research Methods//, which in turn closely follows the classification proposed in Levin (1993). 
- 
-==== Task Operationalization ==== 
- 
-We operationalize verb categorization as a clustering task. Since the data set is organized hierarchically, 
-we will run two clustering experiments, varying the number of classes and consequently their level of generality: 
- 
-  * **9-way clustering** - models will be tested on their ability to categorize the verbs into the most fine-grained classes of the dataset: //communication// ("talk"), //mentalState// ("know"), //motionManner// ("run"), //motionDirection// ("arrive"), //changeLocation// ("carry"), //bodySense// ("smell"), //bodyAction// ("eat"), //exchange// ("buy"), //changeState// ("destroy"); 
-  * **5-way clustering** - models will be tested on their ability to categorize the verbs into 5 classes: //cognition// (superordinate of //communication// and //mentalState//), //motion// (superordinate of //motionManner//, //motionDirection//, //changeLocation//), //body// (superordinate of //bodySense// and //bodyAction//), //exchange//, and //changeState//; 
- 
-To abstract away from differences stemming from any specific clustering method, you are asked to run your experiments with the //k-means// algorithm available in [[http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/cluto/cluto/overview|CLUTO]]. In case you can not run  [[http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/cluto/cluto/overview|CLUTO]] on your system, the workshop organizers will carry out the clustering for you. In this case, data should be prepared according to a format that will be specified later on. Participants are also invited to experiment with other clustering methods and to compare the results with those obtained with[[http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/cluto/cluto/overview|CLUTO]]. 
- 
- 
-==== Task Evaluation ==== 
- 
-Evaluation will be carried in two stages: 
- 
-1. **quantitative evaluation** - results will be evaluated with respect to the two measures for cluster quality available in CLUTO: //purity// and //entropy// (cf. Zhao, Y. and G. Karypis (2002), "Evaluation of Hierarchical Clustering Algorithms for Document Datasets", in //CIKM 2002//).  
- 
-2. **qualitative evaluation** - participants will be asked to perform a fine-grained error analysis, focussing on critical nouns, hard classes, etc. Details about this type of evaluation will be provided later on. 
- 
-Back to [[Start]] 
-