Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision 		Previous revision
esslli:start [2007/12/03 10:35]
alexlenci 		esslli:start [2010/11/01 14:07] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Lexical Semantics: Bridging the gap between semantic theory +The page you are looking for has moved to [[http://wordspace.collocations.de/doku.php/workshop:esslli:start]].
- and computational simulations ====== +
- +
-//Workshop at ESSLLI 2008, Hamburg, August 4-9 2008// +
- +
-=== Workshop webpage: === +
-[[http://wordspace.collocations.de/doku.php?id=esslli:start|http://wordspace.collocations.de/doku.php?id=esslli:start]] +
- +
-=== ESSLLI webpage: === +
-[[http://www.illc.uva.nl/ESSLLI2008/|http://www.illc.uva.nl/ESSLLI2008/]] +
- +
- +
- +
-==== Background and motivation ==== +
- +
-Corpus-based distributional models (such as LSA or HAL) +
-have been claimed to capture interesting aspects of word meaning.  +
-However, although they have been proposed as +
-plausible simulations of human semantic space organization, +
-careful and extensive empirical tests of such claim are still lacking. +
- +
-Systematic evaluation of these models focus on large scale +
-quantitative tasks, often more oriented towards engineering +
-applications (see, e.g., the recent SEMEVAL evaluation campaign) than +
-towards the challenges from formal semantics, linguistic theory, +
-philosophy and cognitive science. This has resulted into a great divide  +
-between corpus-driven computational approaches to semantics and more +
-symbolic approaches, typical of the linguistic and of most +
-of the cognitive tradition. +
- +
-Moreover, whereas human lexical semantic competence is obviously +
-multi-faceted, ranging from free association to taxonomic judgments to +
-relational effects, tests of distributional models tend to focus on a +
-single aspect (typically limited to semantic similarity detection), +
- and few if any models have been tuned to tackle +
-different facets of semantics in an integrated manner. +
- +
-Our workshop purports to fill these gaps by inviting single scholars +
-and research teams to test their computational models on a variety of small but +
-carefully designed tasks, that aim to bring out linguistically and +
-cognitively interesting aspects of semantics. Specifically, we envisage the +
-following tasks: +
- +
-- categorization; +
-  * concrete nouns categorization; +
-  * concrete vs. abstract nouns discrimination; +
-  * verb categorization; +
- +
-- modeling free association; +
- +
-- modeling generation of salient properties of concepts; +
- +
-- one or more tasks to test semantic compositionality +
- +
-The focus is NOT on competition, but on understanding how different +
-models highlight different semantic aspects, and how far we are from +
-integrated models of all such aspects. In fact, we believe that the current +
-state of the art on computational semantics  +
-does not need to discover the best model, but rather +
-to enlarge the understanding of the limits and potentialities  +
-of different approaches when confronted with cognitively realistic tasks.  +
-To this effect, annotated +
-datasets will be distributed to the participants, that will be +
-encouraged to explore them and highlight interesting aspects of their +
-models' performance, perform quantitative and qualitative error analysis, etc. +
- +
-Theoretical and experimental papers related to the task datasets and +
-simulation results are also invited. +
- +
-Through collaborative preparatory work on the Word Space wiki and official homepage +
-([[http://wordspace.collocations.de/doku.php/esslli:start|http://wordspace.collocations.de/doku.php/esslli:start]]) and thanks to the ESSLLI +
-multiple-day workshop format, we hope that this initiative will foster +
-collaboration among the nascent community of researchers interested in +
-computational semantics from a theoretical rather than applicative +
-point of view. +
- +
-Ongoing work on data-set preparation can be monitored at [[http://wordspace.collocations.de/doku.php/data:start|http://wordspace.collocations.de/doku.php/data:start]] +
- +
-We ask for expressions of interest from researchers and teams that +
-might take part in the initiative and might want to have a say in test +
-set design. +
- +
-For further information, please write to lexsem08@gmail.com. +
- +
-==== Dates (tentative) ==== +
- +
-  * Late January, 2008: Data-sets available on Workshop website +
-  * Mar 8, 2008: Paper submission deadline +
-  * April, 2008: Notification +
-  * August 4-9, 2008: Workshop in Hamburg (during the first week of ESSLLI) +
- +
-==== Program Committee ==== +
- +
-Marco Baroni (University of Trento), **WS co-organizer** +
- +
-Reinhard Blutner (University of Amsterdam) +
- +
-Gemma Boleda (UPF, Barcelona) +
- +
-Peter Bosch (University of Osnabrück) +
- +
-Paul Buitelaar (DFKI, Saarbrücken) +
- +
-John Bullinaria (University of Birmingham) +
- +
-Katrin Erk (UT, Austin) +
- +
-Stefan Evert (University of Osnabrück), **WS co-organizer** +
- +
-Patrick Hanks (Masaryk University, Brno) +
- +
-Anna Korhonen (Cambridge University) +
- +
-Michiel van Lambalgen (University of Amsterdam) +
- +
-Alessandro Lenci (University of Pisa), **WS co-organizer** +
- +
-Claudia Maienborn (University of Tübingen) +
- +
-Simonetta Montemagni (ILC-CNR, Pisa) +
- +
-Rainer Osswald (University of Hagen) +
- +
-Manfred Pinkal (University of Saarland) +
- +
-Massimo Poesio (University of Trento) +
- +
-Reinhard Rapp (University of Mainz) +
- +
-Magnus Sahlgren (SICS, Kista) +
- +
-Sabine Schulte im Walde (University of Stuttgart) +
- +
-Manfred Stede (University of Potsdam) +
- +
-Suzanne Stevenson (University of Toronto) +
- +
-Peter Turney (NRC Canada, Ottawa) +
- +
-Tim Van de Cruys (University of Groningen) +
- +
-Gabriella Vigliocco (University College, London) +
- +
-Chris Westbury (University of Alberta)+
  
 +[[:workshop:esslli:start|Click here]] to go to the page.

You are here: start » esslli