Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
esslli:start [2007/12/04 13:39] schtepf |
esslli:start [2010/11/01 14:07] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== Lexical Semantics Workshop (ESSLLI 2008) ====== | + | The page you are looking |
| - | + | ||
| - | **Bridging the gap between semantic theory and computational simulations**\\ | + | |
| - | //Workshop at [[http:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Background and motivation ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Corpus-based distributional models (such as LSA or HAL) | + | |
| - | have been claimed to capture interesting aspects of word meaning | + | |
| - | and provide an explanation for the rapid acquisition of semantic | + | |
| - | knowledge by human language learners. | + | |
| - | However, although these have been proposed as | + | |
| - | plausible simulations of human semantic space organization, | + | |
| - | careful and extensive empirical tests of such claims are still lacking. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Systematic evaluations of these models typically focus on large-scale | + | |
| - | quantitative tasks, often more oriented towards engineering | + | |
| - | applications (see, e.g., the recent SEMEVAL evaluation campaign) than | + | |
| - | towards the challenges posed by formal semantics, linguistic theory, | + | |
| - | philosophy and cognitive science. | + | |
| - | between corpus-driven computational approaches to semantics on the one | + | |
| - | hand and theory-driven symbolic approaches on the other -- a situation that | + | |
| - | is characteristic of the linguistic and of most | + | |
| - | of the cognitive tradition. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Moreover, whereas human lexical semantic competence is obviously | + | |
| - | multi-faceted -- ranging from free association to taxonomic judgments to | + | |
| - | relational effects -- tests of distributional models tend to focus on a | + | |
| - | single aspect (most typically the detection of semantic similarity), | + | |
| - | and few if any models have been tuned to tackle | + | |
| - | different facets of semantics in an integrated manner. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Our workshop purports to fill these gaps by inviting single scholars | + | |
| - | and research teams to test their computational models on a variety of small but | + | |
| - | carefully designed tasks that aim to bring out linguistically and | + | |
| - | cognitively interesting aspects of semantics. Specifically, | + | |
| - | following tasks: | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * categorization | + | |
| - | ** concrete nouns categorization | + | |
| - | ** concrete vs. abstract nouns discrimination | + | |
| - | ** verb categorization | + | |
| - | * modeling free association | + | |
| - | * generation of salient properties of concepts | + | |
| - | * one or more tasks to test semantic compositionality | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | The focus is NOT on competition, | + | |
| - | models highlight different semantic aspects, how far we are from | + | |
| - | an integrated model, and which aspects of semantics are beyond the | + | |
| - | reach of purely distributional approaches. | + | |
| - | In fact, we believe that the current | + | |
| - | state of the art on computational semantics | + | |
| - | does not need to discover the best model, but rather | + | |
| - | to enlarge the understanding of the limits and potentialities | + | |
| - | of different approaches when confronted with cognitively realistic tasks. | + | |
| - | To this effect, annotated | + | |
| - | datasets will be distributed to the participants, | + | |
| - | encouraged to explore them and highlight interesting aspects of their | + | |
| - | models' | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | In addition to these practical tasks, theoretical and experimental papers | + | |
| - | discussing the relation between distributional and symbolic approaches to meaning | + | |
| - | are also invited. | + | |
| - | task data sets from a theoretical perspective or that discuss simulation results | + | |
| - | and their implications | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Through collaborative preparatory work on the Word Space wiki | + | |
| - | ([[http:// | + | |
| - | and thanks | + | |
| - | multiple-day workshop format, we hope that this initiative will foster | + | |
| - | collaboration among the nascent community of researchers interested in | + | |
| - | computational semantics from a theoretical rather than engineering-oriented | + | |
| - | point of view. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | Ongoing work on data-set preparation can be monitored at [[http:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | We ask for expressions of interest from researchers and teams that | + | |
| - | are planning to take part in the initiative and might want to contribute to | + | |
| - | the desing of the tasks and test sets. | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | For further information, | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ===== Workshop information ===== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== Dates (tentative) ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Late January, 2008: Data-sets available on Workshop website | + | |
| - | * Mar 8, 2008: Paper submission deadline | + | |
| - | * April, 2008: Notification | + | |
| - | * August 4-9, 2008: Workshop in Hamburg (during the first week of ESSLLI) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== Programme Committee ==== | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | * Marco Baroni (University of Trento), **WS co-organizer** | + | |
| - | * Reinhard Blutner (University of Amsterdam) | + | |
| - | * Gemma Boleda (UPF, Barcelona) | + | |
| - | * Peter Bosch (University of Osnabrück) | + | |
| - | * Paul Buitelaar (DFKI, Saarbrücken) | + | |
| - | * John Bullinaria (University of Birmingham) | + | |
| - | * Katrin Erk (UT, Austin) | + | |
| - | * Stefan Evert (University of Osnabrück), | + | |
| - | * Patrick Hanks (Masaryk University, Brno) | + | |
| - | * Anna Korhonen (Cambridge University) | + | |
| - | * Michiel van Lambalgen (University of Amsterdam) | + | |
| - | * Alessandro Lenci (University of Pisa), **WS co-organizer** | + | |
| - | * Claudia Maienborn (University of Tübingen) | + | |
| - | * Simonetta Montemagni (ILC-CNR, Pisa) | + | |
| - | * Rainer Osswald (University of Hagen) | + | |
| - | * Manfred Pinkal (University of Saarland) | + | |
| - | * Massimo Poesio (University of Trento) | + | |
| - | * Reinhard Rapp (University of Mainz) | + | |
| - | * Magnus Sahlgren (SICS, Kista) | + | |
| - | * Sabine Schulte im Walde (University of Stuttgart) | + | |
| - | * Manfred Stede (University of Potsdam) | + | |
| - | * Suzanne Stevenson (University of Toronto) | + | |
| - | * Peter Turney (NRC Canada, Ottawa) | + | |
| - | * Tim Van de Cruys (University of Groningen) | + | |
| - | * Gabriella Vigliocco (University College, London) | + | |
| - | * Chris Westbury (University of Alberta) | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== Workshop webpage: ==== | + | |
| - | [[http:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | ==== ESSLLI webpage: ==== | + | |
| - | [[http:// | + | |
| - | + | ||
| + | [[: | ||