Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Next revision Both sides next revision | ||
esslli:start [2008/06/18 15:45] schtepf |
esslli:start [2008/08/13 17:03] schtepf |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
**Bridging the gap between semantic theory and computational simulations**\\ | **Bridging the gap between semantic theory and computational simulations**\\ | ||
- | //Workshop at [[http:// | + | //Workshop at [[http:// |
+ | * [[esslli: | ||
+ | * [[esslli: | ||
+ | * [[esslli: | ||
+ | * [[esslli: | ||
+ | ===== Invited speakers ===== | ||
+ | * // | ||
+ | * // | ||
- | ===== Background and motivation ===== | ||
- | [[http:// | + | ===== Programme Committee |
- | + | ||
- | Corpus-based distributional models (such as LSA or HAL) | + | |
- | have been claimed to capture interesting aspects of word meaning | + | |
- | and provide an explanation for the rapid acquisition of semantic | + | |
- | knowledge by human language learners. | + | |
- | However, although these models have been proposed as | + | |
- | plausible simulations of human semantic space organization, | + | |
- | careful and extensive empirical tests of such claims are still lacking. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Systematic evaluations typically focus on large-scale | + | |
- | quantitative tasks, often more oriented towards engineering | + | |
- | applications (see, e.g., the recent SEMEVAL evaluation campaign) than | + | |
- | towards the challenges posed by linguistic theory, | + | |
- | philosophy and cognitive science. | + | |
- | between corpus-driven computational approaches to semantics on the one | + | |
- | hand and theory-driven symbolic approaches on the other -- a situation that | + | |
- | is characteristic of the linguistic and of most | + | |
- | of the cognitive tradition. | + | |
- | Moreover, whereas human lexical semantic competence is obviously | + | |
- | multi-faceted -- ranging from free association to taxonomic judgments to | + | |
- | relational effects -- tests of distributional models tend to focus on a | + | |
- | single aspect (most typically the detection of semantic similarity), | + | |
- | and few if any models have been tuned to tackle | + | |
- | different facets of semantics in an integrated manner. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Our workshop purports to fill these gaps by inviting research teams and | + | |
- | individual scholars to test their computational models on a variety of small but | + | |
- | carefully designed tasks that aim to bring out linguistically and | + | |
- | cognitively interesting aspects of semantics | + | |
- | ([[#Tasks and data sets|see below]] for details). | + | |
- | datasets are available to the participants, | + | |
- | encouraged to explore them and highlight interesting aspects of their | + | |
- | models' | + | |
- | + | ||
- | The focus is NOT on competition, | + | |
- | models highlight different semantic aspects, how far we are from | + | |
- | an integrated model, and which aspects of semantics are beyond the | + | |
- | reach of purely distributional approaches. | + | |
- | In fact, we believe that at the current state of the art in | + | |
- | computational and distributional semantics, our goal should not be | + | |
- | to develop the best-performing model for a specific application, | + | |
- | to enlarge our understanding of the limits and potentialities | + | |
- | of different approaches when confronted with cognitively realistic tasks. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | In addition to these practical tasks, theoretical and experimental papers | + | |
- | discussing the relation between distributional and symbolic approaches to meaning | + | |
- | are also invited. | + | |
- | task data sets from a theoretical perspective or that discuss simulation results | + | |
- | and their implications for semantic and cognitive theory. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Through collaborative preparatory work on the Word Space wiki ([[http:// | + | |
- | collaboration among the nascent community of researchers interested in computational semantics from a theoretical rather than engineering-oriented point of view. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | For further information, | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ===== Tasks and data sets ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | In order to reach a better understanding of the possibilities and limitations | + | |
- | of distributional models of word meaning, we envisaged a number of tasks that | + | |
- | focus on linguistic and cognitive challenges rather than application engineering. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Small annotated data sets are available on the workshop page and participants are invited | + | |
- | to apply their computational models and conduct a thorough analysis of the results. | + | |
- | The goal is not to achieve better precision than competitors, | + | |
- | the strengths and weaknesses of individual models, analyze and explain errors, etc. | + | |
- | Theoretical discussions of the data sets from a linguistic or cognitive perspective | + | |
- | are also invited and will complement the empirical findings. | + | |
- | + | ||
- | Ongoing work on data set preparation can be monitored at [[http:// | + | |
- | + | ||
- | We offer the following tasks (click on the links for detailed task descriptions and downloads): | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * **categorization** | + | |
- | * [[data: | + | |
- | * [[data: | + | |
- | * [[data:Verb Categorization|verb categorization]] | + | |
- | * **modelling free association** | + | |
- | * [[data: | + | |
- | * **generation of salient properties of concepts** | + | |
- | * [[data: | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | ===== Workshop information ===== | + | |
- | + | ||
- | === Dates === | + | |
- | + | ||
- | * **April 4, 2008**: Paper submission deadline | + | |
- | * **April 24, 2008**: Notification | + | |
- | * **August 4-9, 2008**: Workshop in Hamburg (during the first week of ESSLLI) | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | === Programme Committee | + | |
Marco Baroni (University of Trento) **(co-organizer)**\\ | Marco Baroni (University of Trento) **(co-organizer)**\\ | ||
Line 140: | Line 48: | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | ===== Paper submission ===== | ||
- | |||
- | We welcome papers reporting results of experimenting | ||
- | with word space models on one or more workshop tasks, as well as | ||
- | | ||
- | |||
- | We also welcome papers focussing on: | ||
- | * methodological and theoretical issues concerning word space models; | ||
- | * open challenges for distributional methods for semantic analysis; | ||
- | * interactions with formal approaches to meaning; | ||
- | * interaction with cognitive research on human semantic memory. | ||
- | |||
- | The papers should not be longer than 8 pages, and they should be | ||
- | submitted anonymously in PDF format following the | ||
- | [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | Submission must be sent to [[lexsem08@gmail.com|lexsem08@gmail.com]], | ||
- | no later than **April 4**, | ||
- | specifying PAPER SUBMISSION in the subject and the authors' | ||
- | names and affiliation in the message body. | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | === Workshop homepage === | ||
- | [[http:// | ||
- | |||
- | === ESSLLI 2008 homepage === | ||
- | [[http:// | ||